Music Companies File Complaint against Telecom Giant Quoting Promotion of Piracy

Fastest Internet Provider
Privacy Promotion Case

The music industry has registered complaints against Charter Communications®, mentioning that they are promoting piracy indirectly. The music industry complains that Charter® benefits from music piracy by refusing to delete the accounts of users who download copyrighted songs unlawfully. Furthermore, the lawsuit also mentions that the company promotes piracy by providing high-speed internet.

Although providing high Internet speeds is not a violation of any law, they will be held liable if they allow the disobeying users to keep using the account. The leading music companies like Warner, Universal, and Sony registered a complaint against the best internet provider in US District Court, Colorado.

The complaint claims that Charter’s low key approach to the issue means that they allowed the illegal users to continue with the illegitimate activity. Besides, their inaction encouraged more people to take up packages with higher internet speeds.

“For those account holders and subscribers who wanted to download files illegally at faster speeds, Charter obliged them in exchange for higher rates. In other words, the greater the bandwidth its subscribers required for pirating content, the more money Charter made,” the complaint said.

The complaint says that the Charter conducts its network management to keep away the undesirable actions, the ISP has failed to take action against subscribers indulging in copyright infringement multiple times.

Best Internet Provider
High Speed Internet

“Charter condoned the illegal activity because it was popular with subscribers and acted as a draw to attract and retain new and existing subscribers. Charter’s customers, in turn, purchased more bandwidth and continued using Charter’s services to infringe Plaintiffs’ copyrights,” the complaint said. “Charter undoubtedly recognized that if it terminated or otherwise prevented repeat infringer subscribers from using its service to infringe or made it less attractive for such use; Charter would enroll fewer new subscribers, lose existing subscribers, and ultimately lose revenue.”

The complaint observes that music labels dispatched to Charter and other ISPs recognize their violators by their IP addresses.

“Because the copyright holders could only determine the unique IP addresses of an ISP’s infringing subscribers but not their actual identities, they served subpoenas on Charter and other ISPs to obtain the infringing subscribers’ names and contact information,” the complaint said. “Although Charter’s customer agreements allowed it to produce that information and no real doubt existed as to their customers’ underlying infringement, Charter vigorously opposed the subpoenas, undermining the record companies’ efforts to curb direct infringement activity.”

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *